Category: Uncategorized

  • Via BrianMcDaniel.org: Why You Should Be Proactive with Bad News

    I have some good news, and some bad news. The good news is that reporters do not know the bad news yet.

    I crack up every time I look at this quote. The fact that he then goes on to quote Sun Tzu, while commenting on one of my bugaboos (withholding bad news rather than taking control of the situation), and spelling “mold” as “mould,” is just the icing on the cake.

  • Qantas and The Long Haul of a Crisis

    Truthfully, I haven’t been following the Qantas/Rolls Royce ordeal that closely. As with everything, though, there is something we can learn from the bad luck of others. And what I’ve learned from this situation is that crisis communication is a marathon, even when it looks very much like a sprint.

    I really enjoyed Gerald Baron’s post on how social media complicates crisis response in the days after the initial incident. The gist of the article is that Qantas really screwed up the first few hours of the response:

    What’s the bottom line? Qantas had done so many things right in terms of preparation, but overall would get probably get a C- to F grade in this event[.]

    Now contrast that with this article, published in MarketingWeek last week:

    For starters, the past three weeks have witnessed a masterful demonstration of crisis management. As soon as the A380 emergency hit, [Qantas CEO Alan] Joyce took direct control. It was a lightning quick response and one in which he immediately placed the emphasis on the aircraft’s Rolls-Royce engines and not on Qantas’ service record.

    …and…

    Joyce is going to build brand equity from the crisis, not just recover it. Students of PR will know this as the famed “Tylenol 180” strategy named after the painkiller brand that not only recovered from a poisoning scandal in the Eighties but went on to increase sales and brand equity as a result of the way it handled the subsequent fallout.

    How is it possible that these two articles are talking about the same situation? Besides the fact that one is negative and the other positive, they even describe the initial response differently!

    While I would tend to agree with Mr. Baron’s interpretation, I think that the MarketingWeek article implies something that isn’t always noted. Good PR can act as a deodorant. It’s preferable to follow the first, right, credible mantra, but if that fails, and you’re willing to take some pretty significant risks (like grounding a fleet of A380 jets), you can get the public and media to move beyond those first few moments when you tripped up.

    Beyond that idea of fixing poor initial communication, we should understand that even after the rush of media interest, the story continues. Until every last one of those A380s are back in the air, the story can come back with a vengeance. Qantas CEO Joyce, I think, understands this and has continued to work to repair the situation. Much like a marathon, it’s not over after the first mile, no matter how far ahead—or behind—you are.

  • Via BoingBoing: Social Media Worst Case Scenario

    http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/RyMdOT8YJgY?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b

    As you probably know by now, I am prone to overstatement. Just about everything is amazingly cool, a great opportunity to learn, a wonderful statement about something. In my eyes, all of that pales in comparison to this video. I’m taking an early lunch and postponing something I had scheduled to go live this afternoon to post this video.

    The video is a time-constrained presentation that takes events that have already happened, and combines them into a fictional story that demonstrates just how quickly — and how bad — global social media use can impact a local area.

    Watch the video first–it’s only 5 minutes–then read on.

    For government communicators, do you monitor for situations that might affect your jurisdictions? I know that Philly police started doing that after a series of violent flash mobs. Remember the time frame. Can you react quickly enough? Two hours after starting in Japan, all of this happened.

    For private sector folks, do you monitor for situations that might affect your company locations (not just company name)? There’s no reason why the address that got posted couldn’t have been her office. Is your crisis plan ready for situations that occur not to you, but around you? It will still be your office location that gets repeated over and over again on the news.

    If there ever was a need to incorporate social media monitoring into your crisis plans, this is it.